Verified against the official source

Your account got blocked or suspended on an app or platform: what the company can do and what you can do

Short answer

The company can only suspend you for objective, reasonable causes. A clause that lets it block you "whenever it wants" or without prior notice is, unless a sector-specific rule allows it expressly, an absolutely void abusive clause under Peru's Consumer Protection Code — void even if you clicked "I agree."

VerificationVerified against the official sourceSee the sources ↓

  • 9sources cited
  • 9read at the official source
  • 3official institutions

Osiptel · El Peruano · Peruvian State portal (gob.pe)

Checked 1 Oct 2026Next review 28 Mar 2027

PeruviansForeign residents

Blocking you isn’t illegal — doing it however they please is

To you, a digital platform is a provider under the Consumer Protection Code, and as such it answers for the idoneidad (fitness for purpose) of the service it offers: the match between what it promised and what you actually get (art. 18). That includes continued access to the service you signed up for, not just on-time delivery of a product.

That doesn’t mean a company can never suspend you. It means the way it does it — with or without cause, with or without notice, with or without a chance to respond — is also part of the consumer relationship, and can also break the law.

The clause that says “we can suspend you whenever we want” can be void

Almost every app or marketplace’s terms and conditions include a clause along the lines of: “We reserve the right to suspend or cancel your account at any time, at our sole discretion.” Article 50 of the Code attacks it directly. It’s an absolutely void abusive clause — unenforceable even if you accepted it when you signed up — when it:

  • lets the provider unilaterally suspend or terminate the contract (art. 50.b), or
  • lets it end the contract without prior communication, or without a reasonable notice period if the contract has no fixed term (art. 50.c).

The key word is “unenforceable” (inexigible, art. 49.1): the clause can stay written in the contract, but Indecopi can rule that it doesn’t bind you. Clicking “I agree” doesn’t make it valid if it still leaves you at a disadvantage against the company.

There is a real exception here, not a loophole: the law itself carves out cases where “a different legal provision” or “duly-supported prudential rules issued by the relevant authority” allow the unilateral suspension. That’s the case, for example, for banks answering to the SBS (more below).

Changing the rules on you without notice is also prohibited

Beyond blocking accounts, some platforms change service terms (fees, requirements, usage policies) and treat your continued use of the app as acceptance. Article 56.1.c expressly bans this as a coercive commercial method: the provider cannot modify, without your express consent, the terms under which you signed up — “even if the provider believes the change could benefit the consumer” — and your silence cannot be read as acceptance unless you yourself authorized that in advance, expressly.

Does the physical-store “right of admission” apply here?

It’s tempting to invoke the “right of admission” rules (arts. 38–40) to argue that an app also can’t exclude you without an objective cause. The argument is reasonable, but it’s worth being honest about its limits: the text of those articles literally speaks of “establecimientos abiertos al público” (establishments open to the public) and requires restrictions to be posted “by placing signs or notices […] outside the establishment” — language written for physical premises, not digital platforms.

That doesn’t rule out the analogy — Indecopi has extended other consumer rules to the digital environment when the underlying consumer relationship is equivalent — but it isn’t confirmed that arts. 38–40 apply as written to an account block. If your case involves exclusion for a discriminatory reason (origin, race, sex, language, religion, opinion, economic status), you also have the dedicated route covered on the discrimination and right-of-admission page, and potentially the criminal route under article 323 of the Criminal Code.

The platform must give you a complaint channel — and respond within 15 business days

Since the 2026 e-commerce reform (Legislative Decree 1729), every platform, app or digital channel offering goods or services must have accessible, effective, always-operational mechanisms to receive and resolve complaints (art. 24.4). If the company isn’t domiciled in Peru but targets the Peruvian market, the law requires it to keep at least an email address open for complaints, suggestions, exchanges and refunds (art. 24.5).

Once you file your complaint, the general deadline for a response is fifteen (15) business days, non-extendable (art. 24.1). If they don’t respond, or the response doesn’t solve your problem, that’s when it’s time to escalate to Indecopi.

If you sell or deliver on the platform, the rules change

Everything above protects the end consumer: the person who uses the app to buy something, request a ride, book a stay, or similar, “for their own benefit or that of their family or social group.” Article IV, paragraph 1.1, is explicit in excluding from that definition anyone who uses the product or service “normally intended for the purposes of their own activity as a provider.”

That means a marketplace seller, a delivery driver, or a rideshare driver who loses access to the app they use as a work tool faces, in principle, weaker and different protection than a buyer does — because for them, the account isn’t an act of consumption but a tool of their own business. There’s a possible route as a protected “microempresario” when there’s an information asymmetry about something unrelated to their core business (art. IV.1.2), but it isn’t confirmed that this route specifically covers a work-account block. This remains, as of today, a real gap in the law that this page does not resolve.

Bank accounts and digital wallets: a separate set of rules

If what got blocked is a bank account, a card, or a regulated digital wallet, don’t apply the above directly: article 50 itself carves out suspensions based on “duly-supported prudential rules issued by the relevant authority” — and in the financial system, that authority is the SBS. Banks and financial institutions can block accounts for anti-money-laundering purposes or other prudential rules, under their own regime, distinct from a general consumer app.

What to do, step by step

Save evidence of the block, pin down the exact clause the company is relying on, file a complaint through the platform’s mandatory digital channel, and if you don’t get a response in 15 business days or the response doesn’t solve the problem, use the complaints book or file directly with Indecopi. If money was also left frozen in the account, ask for it back explicitly — don’t assume a complaint about the block automatically covers it.

How long it takes to complain about a blocked account

  1. You

    You file the complaint through the app's digital channel

    No deadline set in the law for filing it — sooner is better, while the evidence is fresh

  2. The provider

    The company must respond to your complaint

    Up to 15 business days, non-extendable

    Source: Law No. 31435, amending the Consumer Protection Code, Article 24.1

  3. You

    If they don't respond or the response doesn't solve it, you complain to Indecopi

    No deadline set in this law for filing; check the general statute of limitations before waiting too long

  4. Indecopi

    Indecopi processes and resolves the proceeding

    Varies by track (summary or ordinary); we did not confirm a specific deadline for this scenario

These periods are counted differently, so we don't add them up.

These are the deadlines the law sets expressly. How long it actually takes to get your access or money back depends on the case.

How to file

  1. Save evidence of the blockScreenshot the message or email, the exact date and time, and any reason given (even a generic one like "terms violation").
  2. Find the exact clause the company is relying onReview the terms and conditions you accepted. Note the clause number and its literal text — you'll need it to argue it's abusive.
  3. File a complaint through the platform's digital channelSince 2026, e-commerce platforms are required to have an accessible, effective, always-on complaint channel (art. 24.4). Those not domiciled in Peru must have, at minimum, an email address (art. 24.5).
  4. If they don't respond in 15 business days, escalateUse the complaints book (physical or the app's web version) or file directly with Indecopi if the complaint doesn't solve the problem.
  5. If you have a balance or money held in the account, ask for it explicitlyDon't assume a complaint about the block automatically includes a refund. State it explicitly in the complaint and in the report to Indecopi.

What people fail to ask in time

Did you know that even if Indecopi fines the platform over the block, that doesn't automatically give you back your account or your money — and that if the company doesn't pay the fine, there's still a separate process for that?

Find out before it matters →

What most people believe — and what the law says

The belief

If I accepted the terms and conditions, I can't complain even if they block me without explanation.

The law

Article 49.1 says an abusive clause is "unenforceable" even if you accepted it: you didn't negotiate its terms, it's a take-it-or-leave-it contract. Clicking "I agree" doesn't make it valid if it still puts the consumer at a disadvantage.

The belief

Since the company is foreign or has no office in Peru, I can't file a complaint here.

The law

The Code applies whenever the effects of the consumer relationship occur on Peruvian territory (art. III.2), and since 2026 non-domiciled platforms targeting the Peruvian market must keep at least an email address for complaints (art. 24.5).

The belief

The "right of admission" protects me on an app the same way it does at a physical store.

The law

That's not confirmed. Articles 38 through 40 literally speak of "establecimientos abiertos al público" (establishments open to the public) and require restrictions to be posted "outside the establishment" — language written for physical premises. Whether it extends the same way to a digital account is, as of today, an analogy argument, not a rule written for platforms.

The belief

If I sell or deliver on the platform, I have the same rights as a buyer.

The law

Article IV.1.1 excludes from the definition of consumer anyone who uses the product or service "for the purposes of their own activity as a provider." A seller, delivery driver or rideshare driver who loses the account they use as a work tool faces, in principle, weaker and different protection than a buyer does.

The belief

If they block me without warning, there's nothing to say because the contract allows it.

The law

Article 50, item c, voids the clause that lets a provider end a contract "without prior communication," or without a reasonable notice period — unless another rule expressly allows it, or the sector's regulator has its own prudential rules, as is the case for banks.

Frequently asked questions

Can an app block my account without telling me why?

The company must answer for the idoneidad (fitness for purpose) of the service (arts. 18 and 19), and a clause that lets it suspend you without an objective cause or without prior notice can be an absolutely void abusive clause (art. 50, items b and c). In practice, that means that even if the contract says so, that specific clause may not hold up before Indecopi.

Is the clause that says they can suspend me "at their sole discretion" valid?

Article 50.b voids exactly that clause — the one letting the provider unilaterally suspend or terminate the contract — unless another legal provision allows it, or the sector's regulator has duly-supported prudential rules backing it.

What should I do first if my account gets blocked?

Save the blocking message or email with the date and time, check which clause the company is relying on, and file a complaint through the digital channel the platform is required to have (art. 24.4). If that doesn't resolve it, use the complaints book or file a complaint with Indecopi.

How long does the company have to respond to my complaint?

Fifteen (15) business days, non-extendable, from when you file the complaint, under article 24.1. If they don't respond within that period, or the response doesn't solve the problem, you can complain to Indecopi.

Does the Code protect me if I sell or deliver on the platform, not just if I buy?

It's a gray area. Article IV.1.1 doesn't consider you a consumer if you use the account for the purposes of your own activity as a provider (selling, delivering, driving). You might qualify as a protected microempresario only if there's an information asymmetry about something unrelated to your core business (art. IV.1.2), but that route isn't confirmed for the specific case of an account block.

Does this apply to a blocked bank account or digital wallet?

Article 50 itself carves out "duly-supported prudential rules" issued by the sector's regulator — for banks and digital wallets, that's the SBS. Banks and financial entities can block accounts for anti-money-laundering purposes or other prudential rules, under a different regime than a general consumer app.

What the fine is

ConductSeverityRangeAuthority
Blocking or suspending a consumer's account under an abusive clause, without an objective cause, or without reasonable prior notice
Law No. 29571, arts. 50 and 110
There is no resolution that fixes a band for this specific scenario in advance; Indecopi classifies each case as minor (up to 50 UIT), serious (up to 150 UIT) or very serious (up to 450 UIT) depending on the facts.
variableup to 450 UIT
up to S/ 2,475,000.00
up to $719,059
Indecopi

Fines are set in UIT. When the UIT moves, every fine moves with it. UIT 2026 = S/ 5,500 (Decreto Supremo N.º 301-2025-EF). Reference conversion only. The debt is owed in soles.FX rate as of2026-10-05: US$ 1 = S/ 3.442.

The exact law

Law No. 29571, Consumer Protection Code (Código de Protección y Defensa del Consumidor)Article 18read

Idoneidad (fitness for purpose) — definition

«Se entiende por idoneidad la correspondencia entre lo que un consumidor espera y lo que efectivamente recibe, en función a lo que se le hubiera ofrecido, la publicidad e información transmitida, las condiciones y circunstancias de la transacción, las características y naturaleza del producto o servicio, el precio, entre otros factores, atendiendo a las circunstancias del caso.»
✓ Article read directly in the official sourcePublished 2 September 2010Open official text →

Law No. 29571, Consumer Protection CodeArticle 19read

Providers' obligation

«El proveedor responde por la idoneidad y calidad de los productos y servicios ofrecidos; por la autenticidad de las marcas y leyendas que exhiben sus productos o del signo que respalda al prestador del servicio, por la falta de conformidad entre la publicidad comercial de los productos y servicios y éstos...»
✓ Article read directly in the official sourcePublished 2 September 2010Open official text →

↳Article III, paragraph 2, and Article IV, paragraphs 1 and 2read

Territorial scope and definitions of consumer and provider

«III.2 Las disposiciones del presente Código se aplican a las relaciones de consumo que se celebran en el territorio nacional o cuando sus efectos se producen en éste. [...] IV.1.1 Las personas naturales o jurídicas que adquieren, utilizan o disfrutan como destinatarios finales productos o servicios [...] en beneficio propio o de su grupo familiar o social, actuando así en un ámbito ajeno a una actividad empresarial o profesional. No se considera consumidor [...] a quien adquiere, utiliza o disfruta de un producto o servicio normalmente destinado para los fines de su actividad como proveedor.»
✓ Article read directly in the official sourcePublished 2 September 2010Open official text →

Legislative Decree No. 1729, amending Law No. 29571 for e-commerceArticle 24, paragraphs 24.4 and 24.5 (added)read

Complaint handling on digital e-commerce platforms

«Los proveedores que ofrezcan bienes o servicios a través de plataformas, aplicaciones u otros canales digitales de comercio electrónico deben contar con mecanismos accesibles, eficaces y permanentemente operativos para la atención de reclamos [...] Los proveedores no domiciliados en el país que ofrezcan bienes o servicios a través de plataformas [...] dirigidos al mercado peruano que no cuenten con mecanismos para la atención de reclamos, implementan y mantienen operativa, como mínimo, una dirección de correo electrónico...»
✓ Article read directly in the official sourcePublished 12 February 2026Open official text →

Law No. 31435, amending the Consumer Protection CodeArticle 24.1read

15-business-day deadline to respond to a complaint

«El reclamo que se registre en el Libro de Reclamaciones determina la obligación del proveedor de cumplir con atenderlo y darle respuesta en un plazo no mayor a quince (15) días hábiles»
✓ Article read directly in the official sourcePublished 22 March 2022Open official text →

Law No. 29571, Consumer Protection CodeArticles 38, 39 and 40read

Non-discrimination, burden of proof, and duty to disclose access restrictions at establishments

«38.2 Está prohibida la exclusión de personas sin que medien causas de seguridad del establecimiento o tranquilidad de sus clientes u otros motivos similares. [...] Artículo 40.- Obligación de informar sobre restricciones de acceso a establecimientos. Los establecimientos abiertos al público que establezcan restricciones objetivas y justificadas de acceso a sus instalaciones tienen la obligación de informar dichas restricciones a los consumidores, de manera directa, clara y oportuna, en forma previa al acto de consumo...»
✓ Article read directly in the official sourcePublished 2 September 2010Open official text →

↳Articles 49, 50 and 51read

Abusive clauses: definition, absolute nullity and relative nullity

«49.1 [...] se consideran cláusulas abusivas y, por tanto, inexigibles todas aquellas estipulaciones no negociadas individualmente que, en contra de las exigencias de la buena fe, coloquen al consumidor, en su perjuicio, en una situación de desventaja o desigualdad o anulen sus derechos. [...] Artículo 50.- [...] b. Las que faculten al proveedor a suspender o resolver unilateralmente un contrato, salvo disposición legal distinta o la aplicación de normas prudenciales debidamente sustentadas emitidas por la autoridad correspondiente. c. Las que faculten al proveedor a resolver un contrato sin comunicación previa o a poner fin a un contrato de duración indeterminada sin un plazo de antelación razonable, salvo disposición legal distinta...»
✓ Article read directly in the official sourcePublished 2 September 2010Open official text →

↳Article 56, paragraph 56.1, item cread

Coercive commercial methods — unilateral modification of terms

«c. Modificar, sin el consentimiento expreso del consumidor, las condiciones y términos en los que adquirió un producto o contrató un servicio, inclusive si el proveedor considera que la modificación podría ser beneficiosa para el consumidor. No se puede presumir el silencio del consumidor como aceptación, salvo que él así lo haya autorizado expresamente y con anterioridad.»
✓ Article read directly in the official sourcePublished 2 September 2010Open official text →

↳Article 110read

Consumer Protection Code — administrative sanctions

«El órgano resolutivo puede sancionar las infracciones administrativas a que se refiere el artículo 108 con amonestación y multas de hasta cuatrocientos cincuenta (450) Unidades Impositivas Tributarias (UIT)»
✓ Article read directly in the official sourcePublished 2 September 2010Open official text →

Also searched as: mercado libre blocked my account · uber suspended my account for no reason · airbnb blocked my account · can an app suspend my account without warning · they closed my account and i have a balance · they cancelled my platform account with no explanation · how to report an app for blocking my account · abusive clause account suspension indecopi peru

Related

Consumer

How do you file a complaint with Indecopi? Reclamo vs. denuncia, step by step

You are taking this to Indecopi — which of the two routes fits, and how to file.

Consumer

Is there a 'right of withdrawal' for online purchases in Peru? What the law actually says

The 'right of withdrawal' many assume is automatic in Peru actually requires proving an aggressive or deceptive commercial practice under Article 58.

Consumer

Can a bar, club or shop in Peru refuse you entry under "right of admission"?

Turned away under 'right of admission' — which reasons hold up and which cross the line.

Consumer

Delivery apps in Peru (Rappi, PedidosYa): order not delivered, damaged, or double-charged

The Consumer Code never mentions Rappi or PedidosYa, but Indecopi already fined them in 2025 for hiding behind being 'just intermediaries.'

Consumer

Unauthorized recurring charges and subscriptions in Peru: what you can do

An app with no visible cancel button isn't a legal limit — it's an obstacle you can report.

Consumer

Do online stores in Peru need a complaints book?

You sell online with no premises — does the complaints-book obligation still reach you?

Consumer

How long does a business in Peru have to answer a complaints-book entry?

You filed and heard nothing back — how long they have, and when the clock starts.

Personal finance

Currency exchange in Peru: what can they ask you for, and how much cash can you carry when you travel?

From what amount does an exchange house record your transaction for the UIF, and how much cash can you carry undeclared?

Work

App-based delivery and ride-hailing workers in Peru: what does labor law say today?

You deliver or drive through an app: employee or self-employed under Peruvian law, and is there a law for you yet?

What this page already lets you do

  • Name the rule that protects you
  • Copy the exact article and send it
  • Follow the steps, in order
  • Know how far the fine goes